Windows :: mod_md v2.2.3

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Windows :: mod_md v2.2.3

Steffen



+1 For me it is time to mark mod_md as "Stable".

I do not foresee expanding functions now we have ACMEv2, OCSP
stapling, tls-alpn-01, wildcard etc.

The implemented stapling is  great, I recommend it over the mod_ssl
stapling. Also I like the mod_status information.

Tested /branches/v2.2.3  intensive and running in production, no
issues seen.


I had some notes at
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63877   They are just
to make it a little more user-friendly.


Thanks! Stephan

Steffen



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Windows :: mod_md v2.2.3

Stefan Eissing


> Am 13.11.2019 um 11:37 schrieb Steffen <[hidden email]>:
>
>
>
>
> +1 For me it is time to mark mod_md as "Stable".
>
> I do not foresee expanding functions now we have ACMEv2, OCSP stapling, tls-alpn-01, wildcard etc.
>
> The implemented stapling is  great, I recommend it over the mod_ssl stapling. Also I like the mod_status information.
>
> Tested /branches/v2.2.3  intensive and running in production, no issues seen.

+1 from me as well.

> I had some notes at https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63877   They are just to make it a little more user-friendly.

Still on my list.

> Thanks! Stephan
>
> Steffen
>
>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Windows :: mod_md v2.2.3

Steffen
What is the procedure ? Do we need a separate vote “for stable” topic ?

Steffen


> Op 13 nov. 2019 om 12:20 heeft Stefan Eissing <[hidden email]> het volgende geschreven:
>
>> Am 13.11.2019 um 11:37 schrieb Steffen <[hidden email]>:
>>
>> +1 For me it is time to mark mod_md as "Stable".
>>
>> I do not foresee expanding functions now we have ACMEv2, OCSP stapling, tls-alpn-01, wildcard etc.
>>
>> The implemented stapling is  great, I recommend it over the mod_ssl stapling. Also I like the mod_status information.
>>
>> Tested /branches/v2.2.3  intensive and running in production, no issues seen.
>
> +1 from me as well.
>
>> I had some notes at https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63877   They are just to make it a little more user-friendly.
>
> Still on my list.
>
>> Thanks! Stephan
>>
>> Steffen
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Windows :: mod_md v2.2.3

Stefan Eissing
Let's wait for our US based colleagues to wake up and have a cup of coffee or two...

> Am 13.11.2019 um 14:01 schrieb Steffen <[hidden email]>:
>
> What is the procedure ? Do we need a separate vote “for stable” topic ?
>
> Steffen
>
>
>> Op 13 nov. 2019 om 12:20 heeft Stefan Eissing <[hidden email]> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> Am 13.11.2019 um 11:37 schrieb Steffen <[hidden email]>:
>>>
>>> +1 For me it is time to mark mod_md as "Stable".
>>>
>>> I do not foresee expanding functions now we have ACMEv2, OCSP stapling, tls-alpn-01, wildcard etc.
>>>
>>> The implemented stapling is  great, I recommend it over the mod_ssl stapling. Also I like the mod_status information.
>>>
>>> Tested /branches/v2.2.3  intensive and running in production, no issues seen.
>>
>> +1 from me as well.
>>
>>> I had some notes at https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63877   They are just to make it a little more user-friendly.
>>
>> Still on my list.
>>
>>> Thanks! Stephan
>>>
>>> Steffen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>